Still wondering how to vote in next weekend’s Vancouver municipal elections? Wonder no more …
- BOYLE, Christine (OneCity)
- FRY, Pete (GREEN)
- ROBERTS, Anne (COPE)
- SWANSON, Jean (COPE)
- BHANDAL, Taqdir Kaur
- O’KEEFE, Derrick (COPE)
- WONG, David HT (GREEN)
- YAN, Brandon 甄念本 (OneCity)
- CARR, Adriane (GREEN)
- WIEBE, Michael (GREEN)
- DEMERS, David (GREEN)
- SHIVJI, Shamim (Vision Vancouver)
- ZUBKO, Cameron (Vision Vancouver)
- GIESBRECHT, Gwen (COPE)
- IRWIN, John (COPE)
- DUMONT, Camil (GREEN)
- MACKINNON, Stuart (GREEN)
- REDDY, Jennifer (OneCity)
- BERCIC, Carrie (OneCity)
- JAAF, Erica (OneCity)
- PARROTT, Barb (COPE)
- LEUNG, Aaron (Vision Vancouver)
- WONG, Allan (Vision Vancouver)
- DAY, Diana (COPE)
- ARNOLD, Erin (Vision Vancouver)
- OGER, Morgane
Capital Plan Borrowing Questions:
I struggled a bit in deciding who to support for mayor. Independents Shauna Sylvester and Kennedy Stewart both seem like strong candidates. Stewart has a more detailed housing platform, while Sylvester is more detailed on the environment. Stewart is the more strategic choice, Sylvester the more female choice (seriously, Vancouver, 132 years and not one woman in the mayor’s chair?). In the end, premised on the assumption that Stewart will probably win regardless of all my soul-searching, I’m going with Sylvester. I figure if she gets enough support — perhaps even leapfrogging into second place past the NPA’s Ken Sim (dare to dream, right?) — the eventual winner might get the message that voters have some appetite for the nitty-gritty. Stewart’s penchant for headline-grabbing issues like the Trans Mountain Pipeline and the UBC subway are well and good, but they are no substitute for tangling oneself in the weeds of green buildings, zero waste, renewable energy, and bike lanes.
Enterprising readers will notice that while I am endorsing all Vision Vancouver candidates for Parks and Schools, I am not supporting any of its Council candidates. I have always agreed with Vision on many issues, but this last decade, they really screwed the pooch on housing. True, there is only so much that municipal governments can do. One gets the impression, however, that housing affordability did not appear on Vision’s radar until the end of Mayor Gregor Robertson’s second term, by which time it was too little too late. Vision is long overdue for a well-deserved spanking, and progressive voters would do well to look to parties that set more ambitious non-market housing goals.
You might also notice that I am not voting for any Green School Board candidates. I find myself philosophically aligned with Green Parties in general, but the Vancouver Greens are going through something of an identity crisis, valuing what they perceive as independence over what I perceive as principle. This sometimes manifests itself as fickleness or head-scratching unpredictability. A case in point: trustee Janet Fraser’s decision four years ago to vote in an NPA School Board chair instead of Vision’s Patti Bacchus. (To her credit, she switched back to Vision one year later, and has since become chair in her own right.) Or take the party’s short-lived nomination of engine-revving bike lane opponent Nicholas Chernen to its School Board slate. (He stepped down after reports that one of his many nuisance lawsuits against elected officials was still ongoing.) The Greens may reap political rewards for being everything to everyone — indeed, I would not be surprised to see them win most or all of the seats for which they are running — but their judgment can be questionable. That said, they have plenty of good ideas on sustainability and housing affordability, as well as several smart candidates.
COPE, Vancouver’s oldest left-wing party, has long been so riddled by infighting as to be easily dismissed. However, with the addition of legendary anti-poverty activist Jean Swanson to its Council slate, the party seems on the verge of a mini-comeback. One poll last month showed COPE second only to the Greens in Vancouverites’ party preferences. Signature policies include a rent freeze and a mansion tax.
Finally, there’s OneCity: not as centrist as Vision, not as nutso as COPE. Just smart, earnest progressives who skew young and female. Signature policy: a land value capture tax. Might be the best party in the bunch.